Skip to main content

Prefinished vs. Jobsite finished floors


Finishes for hardwood flooring have improved dramatically over the last several years, however one question still remains. Is a factory finish better than a site-finished floor, or vice versa? In this article I will talk about both types of finishes and then you can decide for yourself, which is better.

The main benefit to having a prefinished floor is that the finish is done under a controlled environment at the factory, thus ensuring a smooth uniform finish. Factory finished floors are usually coated using a water-based polyurethane with aluminum oxide particles suspended in the finish. Aluminum oxide when added to the finish makes the finish harder and more resistant to wear. Aluminum oxide may provide some additional abrasion resistance, however I do not believe it is any more scratch resistant than a site finished floor. The downside to aluminum oxide flooring is that they can be very difficult to refinish successfully. Strict procedures must be followed in order to refinish these types of floors.

Hardwood flooring that is finished on-site has its benefits too. Site finished floors have a tabletop appearance and are completely sealed with a polyurethane finish. Prefinished floors typically have a micro-bevel and are not completely sealed once installed. Also, if you choose to have a job-site finished floor, you can choose the gloss level before installation. Most prefinished floors generally have a semi-gloss coating, however some floors are available in a high gloss and matte finish. If you are looking for a low-matte prefinished hardwood floor, you may find it more difficult to find exactly what you are looking for. One of the most durable hardwood floor finishes that can be found today is called Traffic. This product is a water-based polyurethane that is second to none in the industry and is applied on-site by a sand and finish contractor. Traffic is a commercially rated finish made by Bona Kemi and is available in a satin and semi-gloss water-based urethane.

The only real way to tell which type of finish is better, is to look at the Taber abrasion test for both types of finishes. The Taber abrasion test is the main method used for testing the durability of hardwood floor finishes. Traffic by Bona Kemi has some of the highest Taber test results in the industry. For more information about these methods of testing visit: www.taberindusries.com Before you decide which type of finished floor you want, I recommend taking a look at a new site finished floor and one that is prefinished from the factory. I believe you will find that a site-finished floor is a nicer looking than its prefinished counterpart, however this is just my opinion.
Thanks,
The Floor Man

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Solid Vs. Engineered Hardwood. Which is better?

In this article I will cover the difference between engineered and solid wood flooring. I often get asked; is engineered hardwood actually real wood? The answer to that question is: Yes! There are some who think that engineered wood is inferior to its solid counterpart. Solid wood has its benefits, however it is not necessarily better than engineered. Actually, the opposite just may be true. Engineered hardwood has a cross-plywood construction, with a solid wood veneer laminated to the top. Solid hardwood is just that, solid. Both styles range in thickness from 5/16 to 3/4 inch. Both types of floors come prefinished or unfinished and come in a variety of widths and styles. There are several benefits to engineered hardwood. Here are just a few. Engineered hardwood is more dimensionally stable than solid wood flooring. Engineered floors can be glued down directly to concrete, floated or stapled. They can be installed above, on, or below grade. Engineered floors are less prone to cupping

Urethane vs. Acrylic adhesives

If you are about to install engineered hardwood using the glue down method, I recommend that you read this article. One of the most important factors when installing engineered hardwood is the adhesive. Using the proper adhesive is critical to a successful installation. In this article I will briefly cover the differences between Acrylic and Urethane based adhesives. Let me start with acrylic adhesives. Acrylic adhesives are resin based and contain a certain percentage of water in them. The main problem with resin based adhesives, is the lack of tensile strength. In order for Acrylic adhesives to perform at their optimal level, the sub-floor needs to be well prepared and extremely flat. If the sub-floor is not level and flat and you choose to use an acrylic adhesive, I guarantee you will have hollow spots once the job is complete. Hollow spots are areas in which the wood floor is not adhered properly to the substrate. This problem is common and can be recognized by a popping or hollow

The Valinge Locking System

If you are looking to purchase a new laminate or hardwood floor and you plan on doing it yourself, then I recommend buying Robina. Robina laminate and hardwood, both feature the Valinge locking system. This locking system is the best on the market today and is the easiest laminate/wood floor to install ever. Valinge produces a 2G and a 5G locking mechanism. The 5G versions are used on all 12mm laminates and all 1/2" wood products. The 2G systems are used on 8.3mm laminates and 3/8" wood products. The main difference between the 2G and the 5G is that the 5G products has a plastic clip on the end of the boards, the 2G does not. However, both locking systems work identically. The big advantage Valinge has against its competition is that there is no need for a tapping block or hammer. This product drops and locks right into place with no beating or banging. The Unilin system requires a tapping block and hammer (which could damage the floor) and is more difficult to install. The V