Skip to main content

Lumber Liquidators; Raided by Federal Authorities.




On September 26, 2013 federal officials raided Lumber Liquidators home office in Toano, Va. The raid was carried out by special agents; including, Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations unit, The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the United States Justice Department. The details of the search warrant were sealed; however, there is evidence that Lumber Liquidators has been importing illegal lumber from Russia. During the initial investigations, the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) Traveled to the Russian sawmills. They disguised themselves as fictitious buyers and secretly recorded conversations with executives from the Suifenhe Xingjia Economic and Trade Co. When questioned, the Chinese Executives "blew the whistle" on Lumber Liquidators; claiming that Lumber Liquidators was fully aware that they were purchasing illegal lumber. Illegal harvesting of lumber is a multi-billion dollar industry, but Ill save that for another article. If the accusations are true, this is in direct violation of the The Lacey Act. This is a federal statue that prohibits the importation of illegal fish, plants, and wildlife into the U.S. Criminal violations carry penalties up to 500k per offense. According to the EIA, Lumber Liquidators purchased several million square feet of illegal lumber; specifically, from the Siberian tigers natural habitat, where only approximately 450 big cats remain.


The question now is, "how will this affect the retail giant"? I expect they will incur large fines, which may force them to close some of their 300+ locations. What ever the penalty, it needs to be a swift and just judgement. Companies like Lumber Liquidators are bad for the industry and should be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law. For more information on the Lumber Liquidators raid, watch the following video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKqwMH2N0vc


Best Regards,

The Floor Man







Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Solid Vs. Engineered Hardwood. Which is better?

In this article I will cover the difference between engineered and solid wood flooring. I often get asked; is engineered hardwood actually real wood? The answer to that question is: Yes! There are some who think that engineered wood is inferior to its solid counterpart. Solid wood has its benefits, however it is not necessarily better than engineered. Actually, the opposite just may be true. Engineered hardwood has a cross-plywood construction, with a solid wood veneer laminated to the top. Solid hardwood is just that, solid. Both styles range in thickness from 5/16 to 3/4 inch. Both types of floors come prefinished or unfinished and come in a variety of widths and styles. There are several benefits to engineered hardwood. Here are just a few. Engineered hardwood is more dimensionally stable than solid wood flooring. Engineered floors can be glued down directly to concrete, floated or stapled. They can be installed above, on, or below grade. Engineered floors are less prone to cupping

Urethane vs. Acrylic adhesives

If you are about to install engineered hardwood using the glue down method, I recommend that you read this article. One of the most important factors when installing engineered hardwood is the adhesive. Using the proper adhesive is critical to a successful installation. In this article I will briefly cover the differences between Acrylic and Urethane based adhesives. Let me start with acrylic adhesives. Acrylic adhesives are resin based and contain a certain percentage of water in them. The main problem with resin based adhesives, is the lack of tensile strength. In order for Acrylic adhesives to perform at their optimal level, the sub-floor needs to be well prepared and extremely flat. If the sub-floor is not level and flat and you choose to use an acrylic adhesive, I guarantee you will have hollow spots once the job is complete. Hollow spots are areas in which the wood floor is not adhered properly to the substrate. This problem is common and can be recognized by a popping or hollow

Hardwax Oil vs. Urethane Finishes

In the early to mid 1980's,  a new type of urethane fini sh entered the market; water-base urethane was the new craze. With the entrance of water-base into the market-place, contractors quickly began to realize its value. The new water-base finishes added extra durability, dried much faster than its counterpart, and reduced the amount of labor hours. Prior to urethane finishes, hardwood floors were often sealed with multiple layers of shellac (lacquer was also popular); contractors would apply a coat of hot wax, which acted as a protective barrier. Finally, contractors would then polish the floor; finishing it up. Now, almost after a half of a century, the new craze is here; "Hardwax Oil".  Made from waxes and oils, such as carnauba and parrafin wax, and natural oils, such as sunflower and linseed. Hardwax Oil is quickly gaining favor in the hardwood finish industry. So, the question is, which is better. Urethane or Hardwax Oil? The following material will compare the tw